Just wondering why you reverted my recent edits on the Chuay Jai article. I found that these were more gramatically sound than the previous version that you restored. The first sentence of the second paragraph of the header, in particular, was a run-on sentence. Other errors, such as in punctuation, were also there.
Ah, well thanks for clarifying. Most of my grammar-related edits lately have been because of one particular user's awful grammar. Already warned him to double-check and proofread, but he doesn't seem to be listening. :(